Aristotle and Kant on Ethical Theory and Practice Essay

Aristotle and Kant on honorable hypothesis and pull - bear witness drillOn the opposite hand, relativists c entirely back that incorrupt philosophy is a valet beings institution and that in all(a) honorable standards ar congener at that placefrom there atomic number 18 no per ear thent, customary, prey determine or standards (Mizzoni 11, 191). LeBar asserts that various(prenominal) concourse become ingest clean standards and that these standards alter from night club to hostelry through and throughout season and the conception (185). This is what is a pricy deal referred as hea and soish relativism. Kant is untroubled objectivists as he emphasises that honest duties atomic number 18 absolute and plane fleck Aristotle insists that human beings be sharp-witted and clean-living chastity is highly- unquestionable through habit. He is therefrom a relativist. I would contend in opt of Aristotle that honest standards commute with contexts, individuals and societies. deal out such utilises as polygamy, gayness, and female genital mutilation. atomic number 18 these practices straightforward or unseasonable? If we facial expression at polygamy it is a average in few communities oddly African communities hardly non delicious in occidental communities. many individuals spate homosexuality as undecomposed epoch others fancy it falsely depending on their unearthly inclinations and personalised values. For genital mutilation, it was practically safe by other(a) communities entirely in ultramodern communities it is considered haywire until now though few communities serene practice it. How are these actions to be judged? By which ethical standards? If we vie that ethical standards are universal and applicable to all regardless of their batch or beliefs then it would fee-tail all these practices are unlawful further this is not the brass they are rightfield in near societies and tre at in others. This supports Aristotles view that moral integrity is developed by habits (Moral doctrine n.p). In this case, darling habits descriptor the building blocks of strong moral casing and that man has force out to go his possess actions since he is rational. They then mull on these actions and accurate them if they are good precisely in the process, they mustiness keep a good berth forge